S.751 VS H.5202 — BILL COMPARISON

South Carolina has two nitrous oxide bills advancing simultaneously. Here is how they differ.

LIVE BILL STATUS

S.751 — SENATE
Sponsors: Senators Sutton, Ott, Zell, Shane Garrett, Ronnie Walker
Current Status: Passed full Senate 42-0 on March 4, 2026 · Now in SC House.
Track S.751 live on scstatehouse.gov →
H.5202 — HOUSE
Sponsor: Rep. Teeple
Current Status: Referred to House Judiciary Committee — February 18, 2026.
Track H.5202 live on scstatehouse.gov →

THE FUNDAMENTAL DIFFERENCE

H.5202
NEAR-TOTAL PROHIBITION
S.751
NEAR-TOTAL COMMERCIAL BAN
H.5202 (Teeple, House): Near-total prohibition — unlawful to sell nitrous oxide to anyone except exempt entities. No individual consumer may purchase for any purpose.
S.751 Amended (Sutton/Ott/Zell/S.Garrett/R.Walker, Senate): Near-total commercial ban — unlawful to sell recreational nitrous oxide except to exempt entities. Adults 18+ may purchase only for verified lawful use (medical, culinary with food permit, automotive with dealer agreement, industrial, research, government).
Both bills now impose near-total commercial bans. S.751 preserves narrower exemptions with documentation requirements (food permits, dealer agreements) and is harder to challenge constitutionally. H.5202 takes a broader prohibition approach with simpler exemption categories.

SIDE-BY-SIDE COMPARISON

PROVISION S.751 (SENATE) H.5202 (HOUSE)
Regulatory model Near-total commercial ban (exempt entities with documentation) Near-total prohibition (exempt entities only)
Penalty — 1st offense Up to $1,000 / 6 months Up to $1,000 / 6 months
Penalty — 2nd offense Up to $5,000 / 1 year Up to $5,000 / 1 year
Penalty — 3rd+ offense Up to $10,000 / 3 years Up to $10,000 / 3 years
Flavored N₂O ban ✓ Banned ✓ Banned
Marketing ban Recreational inhalation Recreational inhalation + personal use
Exempt entities ✓ Medical, culinary, automotive, industrial, research, government ✓ Same six categories
Adult personal-use exemptions ✓ Home culinary (8g max), automotive repair, medical Rx ✗ No individual purchase pathway
Purchase limits ✓ 24 cartridges (8g) per day; 580g+ exempt entities only ✗ No provision (all individual purchase prohibited)
Online age verification ✓ Third-party verification + signature on delivery ✗ No online sales provisions
Retail display requirements ✓ Must prevent minor access; $1,000/$2,000 civil penalties ✗ No provision
Product labeling requirements ✓ 5 required label elements (ingredients, servings, warnings) ✗ No provision
SLED enforcement authority ✓ Formally defined; independent premises inspection Referenced in recordkeeping inspection; no standalone definition
Minor misrepresentation penalty ✓ Noncriminal offense; scholarship-protected; no arrest/detention ✗ No provision
License suspension/revocation ✗ No provision ✓ Administrative action by issuing authority
Recordkeeping ✓ 2-year retention; includes individual purchaser records ✓ 2-year retention; exempt entity records only
Effective date Upon Governor’s approval Upon Governor’s approval

IDENTICAL IN BOTH BILLS

▶ Graduated penalty structure: $1,000/6 months (1st), $5,000/1 year (2nd), $10,000/3 years (3rd+)
▶ Flavored nitrous oxide product ban
▶ Ban on marketing for recreational inhalation
▶ Exempt entity categories: medical, culinary, automotive, industrial, research, government
▶ 2-year recordkeeping requirement
▶ Effective upon Governor’s approval

TECHNICAL ISSUES

Chemical nomenclature: S.751 uses “nitrogen monoxide” in its definition — technically that is NO, not N₂O. Both bills include the correct formula N₂O, so legislative intent is clear. H.5202 correctly uses “dinitrogen monoxide.”
Online sales gap: H.5202 has no online sales provisions despite e-commerce being a major distribution channel. S.751 addresses this with third-party age verification and signature-on-delivery requirements.

STRATEGIC ASSESSMENT

S.751 passed the full Senate 42-0 on 3/4/2026 and is now a near-total commercial ban with documentation-based exemptions, online sales provisions, and SLED enforcement. H.5202 takes a simpler prohibition approach. Both bills target the same outcome; they differ primarily in exemption structure and enforcement mechanisms. The House can advance either bill or merge the strongest elements of both during conference committee reconciliation.